I am José Galindo. This blog exists to challenge dogmas that for centuries were imposed on peoples as if they were absolute truth. Many of those ideas did not spread through the strength of reason, but through the weight of power, tradition, and, in other times, even by the sword. Here I analyze texts and doctrines to question what few dare to examine. If you seek to think for yourself and examine what others accept without asking, this channel is for you and will give you a guideline to detect even more lies than those I detected, and perhaps it will even encourage you to create your own blog to warn people who do not deserve to be deceived.
Those who deceive you cannot give a coherent explanation about this. While some worship without seeing, others trade on their blind faith and multiply it. Confessions of Satan: «I handed them the volumes, set the canons for them, and allowed them the illusion of scholastic protest. As long as the battle is over the interpretation of a comma in the text that I myself managed, the structure remains intact; the real danger to my empire arises when the slave stops looking at the page and looks at the hand that collects the tribute.» , ABC 2 69 1[508] , 0023 │ English │ #VZUBFUB
Those who deceive you cannot give a coherent explanation about this. While some worship without seeing, others trade on their blind faith and multiply it. Confessions of Satan: «I handed them the volumes, set the canons for them, and allowed them the illusion of scholastic protest. As long as the battle is over the interpretation of a comma in the text that I myself managed, the structure remains intact; the real danger to my empire arises when the slave stops looking at the page and looks at the hand that collects the tribute.» , ABC 2 69 1[508] , 0023
│ English │ #VZUBFUB
«Show your true power» — Zeus challenges Gabriel. (Video language:English) /283/ https://youtu.be/A34UJOX6x30
,
Day 196
The Message and the Empire: Why I Am Neither Jewish, Muslim, nor Christian. (Video language:Japanese) /297/ https://youtu.be/hqLLs5y0v-Y
"The man Gabriel exposes the inconsistency of Zeus's message: 'Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, as long as they forget eye for an eye and love the enemy of justice.'
Isaiah 42:17 They shall be turned back and utterly put to shame who trust in idols, who say to cast images, 'You are our gods.' If any of those images, to which people pray, could be made of flesh and bone and walk through our streets, posing as a saint, like an angel carrying the supposed message 'love your enemy, do not exclude me,' surely a coherent and informed man could unmask him like this: 'John 3:16 claims that God loved the world. John 17:9 says that Jesus did not pray for the world. Two texts, one single question: how do they fit together? And, speaking of things that don't fit, you don't fool me. If Daniel 9:21 says that Gabriel is a man, and if Deuteronomy 22:5 points out that Jehovah abhors a man who dresses like a woman, yet Gabriel is loved by God, you cannot be Gabriel.'
THE COMMON DOGMA (Christianity and Islam)
Christianity and Islam affirm that Gabriel announced the virginal birth of Jesus to fulfill Isaiah (Matthew 1 / Qur'an 19).
But Isaiah 7:14–16 does not announce Jesus nor speak of a 'perpetual virgin.'
The sign was given to King Ahaz and had to be fulfilled immediately, before the child knew how to distinguish between good and evil.
Isaiah speaks of a young woman, not of a woman who remained a virgin after giving birth.
The fulfillment is found in Hezekiah, a faithful king in the time of Ahaz: he destroys the bronze serpent (2 Kings 18:4–7), God was with him (Emmanuel), and the Assyrian defeat was prophesied by Isaiah (2 Kings 19:35–37).
Christianity and Islam: virginal birth (common dogma).
The perpetual virginal birth, shared by Christianity and Islam, does not come from Isaiah, but from a later reinterpretation imposed by Rome.
These contradictions do not come from God.
A tyrannical empire did not want peoples who uphold their dignity, but peoples on their knees before anything that grants it authority, no matter its form.
Exodus 20:4–5 'You shall not bow down to any image of anything that exists in heaven (birds, the moon, the sun, etc.), on the earth (humans, serpents, golden calves, pyrite (pyrite is a mineral that has a cubic shape), etc.), or in the water (fish, etc.).' Leviticus 26:1 'You shall not make for yourselves idols or carved images, nor set up pillars, nor place engraved stones in your land to bow down to them; for I am Jehovah your God.' When a person kneels before an image to pray or to show respect, that person worships that image; the image becomes his idol. That is why God approved that King Hezekiah destroyed the bronze serpent that God had commanded Moses to make, since when God commanded specific images for specific uses, He never commanded that those images receive worship. 2 Kings 18:4 'He removed the high places, broke the images, cut down the Asherah poles, and broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made, for until those days the children of Israel had been burning incense to it; and he called it 'a piece of bronze.'' The Bible and the Qur'an share a common lie that shows their Roman origin. The Bible says that the angel Gabriel announced that Jesus would be born of a virgin to fulfill a prophecy of Isaiah, and the Qur'an also says that the angel Gabriel announced the virgin birth of Jesus. But that is not true, because Isaiah prophesied the birth of a faithful king who broke the bronze serpent that Moses made, because that creature was being idolized. Furthermore, Isaiah never said that the woman would remain a virgin even after becoming pregnant to give birth to King Hezekiah, son of Ahaz; God was with Hezekiah and with his faithful servants, therefore Hezekiah was Immanuel (read Isaiah 7 and connect it with 2 Kings 18).
a) They worship statues or pray in the name of one or more creatures.
b) The virgin birth of Jesus is a common belief in Christianity and Islam.
Islam
c) They worship a cube.
Judaism
d) They worship a wall.
Christianity — Islam — Judaism
e) These religions make people pray to creatures or bow down before objects made by man in order to humble themselves before them. And that is what the prophet Isaiah condemned (Isaiah 2:8–9).
Is it necessary to obtain archaeological evidence of deception when we already have logical proof? The so-called sacred messages are not consistent. How can the same God protect a murderer from the death penalty in Genesis 4:15, and then condemn murderers to death in Numbers 33:35? If Rome killed those whom it persecuted, and those whom it persecuted belonged to a religion that Rome did not accept, one thing is clear to me: that religion could not have been a new one that denied the law and the prophecies of the Jewish people, but rather the same religion that already existed before Jesus. In fact, according to the Bible, Jesus came to confirm the law and the prophets. If Judaism essentially contains that, why not say that the religion of Jesus was in fact Judaism? Although not the current Judaism, which I will substantiate: as I have shown, treating everyone well because we would like to be treated that way, and loving the enemy, do not align with either the law or the prophets. However, according to the Bible, Jesus said that these teachings summarize the law and the prophets. Nevertheless, I have already shown that these doctrines not only contradict the 'eye for an eye' of the law and the God who hates His enemies and loves His friends as described by the prophets, but also originate from the Greek sage Cleobulus of Lindos. If Rome was able to pass off the teachings of a Greek as if they were those of the faithful king of the Jews, what assures us that it did not also alter the texts of what Rome called the 'Old Testament'? And if those texts match what we know today as 'Judaism,' should we trust that it is the authentic Judaism that was persecuted by Rome?
Image on the left: The statue of Zeus in the Vatican. Do you still believe the image on the right is the face of Jesus on the Shroud of Turin? 2 Corinthians 11:4 'For if someone comes and preaches another Jesus, whom we have not preached...' 'The real Jesus had short hair!' 1 Corinthians 11:14 'Does not nature itself teach you that it is disgraceful for a man to grow long hair?' Galatians 1:9 'As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone preaches to you a gospel different from the one you received, let them be accursed.' (Faithful to the true gospel, Paul has cursed his enemies!) 'The Romans are those cursed ones!' The Word of Zeus: 'Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, as long as they forget an eye for an eye and love the enemy... of justice.' Teaching of Cleobulus of Lindos: 'Do good to your friends and your enemies...' Teaching of Jesus? Matthew 5:44 '...do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who mistreat you and persecute you...'
The prophecies about the vinegar and the garments divided by lot contain no message of forgiveness toward the murderers.
Psalm 22:16 For dogs have surrounded me; a band of evildoers has encircled me; they pierced my hands and my feet. 17 I can count all my bones; meanwhile, they look and stare at me. 18 They divided my garments among themselves, and for my clothing they cast lots.
Psalm 69:21 They also gave me gall for my food, and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink. 22 Let their table before them become a snare, and what should have been for their welfare become a trap. 23 Let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot see, and make their loins tremble continually. 24 Pour out your indignation upon them, and let the fury of your anger overtake them.
Proverbs 29:27 The righteous detest the wicked, and the wicked detest the righteous. Matthew 27:19 While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent word to him, saying: Have nothing to do with that righteous man, for today I have suffered greatly in a dream because of him.
According to Matthew 27:19, Jesus was righteous; according to Proverbs 29:27, the righteous hate the wicked.
If Jesus was righteous and the righteous hate the wicked, how can it be true that Jesus loved his enemies and forgave the wicked men who murdered him?
According to the Bible, the death of Jesus happened so that the prophetic scriptures would be fulfilled: Matthew 27:35 When they had crucified him, they divided his garments among themselves by casting lots, so that what was spoken by the prophet might be fulfilled: They divided my garments among themselves, and for my clothing they cast lots.
John 19:28 After this, Jesus, knowing that all things had already been accomplished, said, so that the Scripture might be fulfilled: I thirst. 29 Now a vessel full of vinegar was sitting there; so they soaked a sponge in vinegar, put it on hyssop, and brought it to his mouth. 30 When Jesus had received the vinegar, he said: It is finished. And bowing his head, he gave up his spirit.
We are told that while dying on the cross, Jesus prayed for his enemies, excusing them because 'they do not know what they are doing': Luke 23:34 Then Jesus said: Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing. And they divided his garments among themselves by casting lots.
But the scriptures prophesied a man who, while dying on the cross, insults his enemies: that is not love, that is hatred. Psalm 22 shows the crucified man calling his executioners dogs. In the prophecy about the vinegar, forgiveness is not requested for the enemies, but punishment; they are cursed. In addition to these contradictions, the parable of the wicked tenants that Jesus used to anticipate his death speaks about punishment against those murderers, not forgiveness. Furthermore, it points out that those tenants knew perfectly well what they were doing (Matthew 21:33-44). It is certain that he did not speak that parable against the righteous of his people, but against the persecutors, who later placed all the blame on the Jews, Jesus' own people. If we look at Psalm 118:2-23, this becomes evident.
Did it become clear to you that Rome has adulterated the texts in order to slander its victims, presenting its slanders as truth?
Around 167 B.C., a king who worshiped Zeus sought to force the Jews to eat pork.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes threatened with death those who obeyed the law of Yahweh: 'You shall not eat anything abominable.'
Seven men chose to die under torture rather than violate that law. (2 Maccabees 7)
They died believing that God would grant them eternal life for not betraying His commandments.
Centuries later, Rome tells us that Jesus appeared teaching:
'It is not what enters the mouth that defiles a man.' (Matthew 15:11)
And then we are told: 'Nothing is unclean if it is received with thanksgiving.' (1 Timothy 4:1–5)
Did those righteous men die for nothing? Is it just to invalidate the law for which they gave their lives?
Compare:
1 Corinthians 10:27 and Luke 10:8
teach that one may eat
whatever is set before them,
without asking questions.
But Deuteronomy 14:3–8 is explicit:
the pig is unclean; you shall not eat it.
Jesus is presented as saying:
'I have not come to abolish the Law or the Prophets,
but to fulfill them.'
Then the question arises:
How is a law 'fulfilled'
by declaring clean
what that same law calls unclean?
The prophecies of Isaiah concerning the final judgment
(Isaiah 65 and Isaiah 66:17)
maintain the condemnation
of eating pork.
How can one claim to respect the prophets
while contradicting their messages?
If the texts of the Bible
passed through the Roman filter,
and that empire persecuted the righteous,
why believe that everything in it
is truth and justice?
When the last of those men who
shared exactly the same faith as
those seven brothers were killed
by the Roman persecutors…
Zeus asks for worship for himself, and coins for the Caesar who worships him. These are not verses of the faith that Rome persecuted; they are verses of the religion that Rome created to keep its emperors rich, to continue worshiping its same god Jupiter (Zeus), at the expense of justice and truth.
False Christ of the Roman Empire (Zeus/Jupiter):
Zeus says: 'Give Caesar your taxes, your coins, your offerings...' Mark 12:16-17
Zeus says: 'And all of you, give me your worship.' Hebrews 1:6
The adversary of Zeus exposes the contradiction between justice based on mutual aid among the righteous and the Hellenized dogma that demands helping the unjust enemy.
The False Christ of the Roman Empire (Zeus/Jupiter) says: 'Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you...' Matthew 5:44. Zeus adds: 'And if you do not do it, if you do not accept me or follow my voice...' Matthew 25:41.
The adversary of Zeus says: 'Get away from the gates of the righteous, Satan! Your contradiction exposes you... You preach love for enemies... but you hate those who do not love you... You say not to curse anyone... but you curse those who do not serve you. The true Christ never preached love for enemies. He knew that those who worship you would feign his words; that is why in Matthew 7:22 he warned about them... he warned about them by pointing to Psalm 139:17-22: 'I hate those who hate you, O Jehovah. I count them as my enemies.''
The Beast, the False Prophet, and the Myth of God's Universal Love
When we read Revelation, we see that the beast, the false prophet, and the dragon are mentioned… it can be deduced that man is capable of being these three things, because Satan means the false witness; the one who gives false testimony is a man; the one who acts as a false prophet is also a man… but there are many false prophets… 'the false prophet' of Revelation 20 is a reference to all of them…
If God created such people, how can some say that God loves everyone? If God's love is eternal, it cannot be said that God loved the world, for if He had done so, He would not create a new one. Yes, this contradicts a message of John. It must be accepted that the beast adulterated the original message in order to pretend to sell the love of God where it never existed for all, but only for the people of the book, since, according to Daniel 12:1, only they are saved from the tribulation. If, according to the Bible, the time of judgment will be like the days of Lot and Noah, it is absurd to suppose that God loves everyone, for if it were true, no one would perish in those days; and since it will be like the days of Lot, it is evident that not all will be saved, as in the days of Lot or Noah. If what the Bible says were true, that God does not want anyone to perish, no one would perish, because, according to the Bible, God accomplishes everything He wants; but those who want to sell false salvation need an argument, and the Roman Empire created several arguments to sell its lie.
References:
Revelation 13:11–14
'Then I saw another beast coming up out of the earth… and he exercises all the authority of the first beast… and deceives those who dwell on the earth…'
Revelation 16:13
'And I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits like frogs.'
Revelation 20:10
'And the devil who deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are…'
Daniel 12:1
'At that time Michael shall stand up… and at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book.'
Genesis 6–7 (days of Noah)
Account of the flood: only Noah, his family, and those who entered the ark survived.
Genesis 19 (days of Lot)
Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah: only Lot and his daughters were delivered.
Gospel of Luke 17:26–30
'As it was in the days of Noah… likewise as it was in the days of Lot… even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed.'
Second Epistle of Peter 3:9
'The Lord… is patient… not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.'
Gospel of John 3:16
'For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son…'
Psalms 115:3
'Our God is in heaven; He does whatever He pleases.'
Psalms 135:6
'Whatever the Lord pleases He does, in heaven and in earth…'
Isaiah 46:10
'My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure.'
Job 42:2
'I know that You can do everything, and that no purpose of Yours can be withheld.'
Revelation 13:18 says:
'Here is wisdom. Let the one who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. And its number is six hundred sixty-six…'
No one calls those who cannot understand to understand.
Therefore, the message was never for all humanity, but for the understanding ones.
Rome — the promoter of the image of the beast — lied,
because it never turned away from idols nor converted to justice.
This agrees with Daniel 12:10:
'The understanding ones shall understand… but none of the wicked shall understand.'
And also with Daniel 12:3:
'The understanding ones shall shine like the brightness of the firmament;
and those who led many to justice, like the stars forever and ever.'
Scripture is clear:
666 is not understood without understanding,
and the wicked do not have it:
2 Peter 2:12: 'These false teachers are like irrational animals…'
1 Corinthians 2:14: 'The natural man cannot understand…'
Proverbs 28:5: 'Evil men do not understand justice,
but those who seek Jehovah understand all things.'
The Roman Empire remained impious because
it was impossible for it to convert to justice.
That is why it did not preach what it persecuted.
Instead, it created Roman Christianity and its doctrine of unmerited love: an injustice presented as virtue
and defended with unmerited hatred against those who question it.
Right side text:
If its idol is not worshipped, it becomes irritated
against those who do not. The beast slanders them.
Love for injustice,
including the slander
and contradiction
it implies.
The beast performs unjust works due to
its love for injustice.
Isaiah 28:13 Therefore the word of Yahweh will be to them, command upon command, command upon command, line upon line, line upon line, a little here, a little there; so that they may go and fall backward, be broken, snared, and taken captive.
Daniel 10:20 He said to me, 'Do you know why I have come to you? For now I must return to fight against the prince of Persia; and when I finish with him, the prince of Greece will come.' 2 Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains it will do so until he himself is taken out of the way.
When the last faithful ones to Yahweh fell, Zeus said: 'Now everyone will worship me.' He said it through the mouths of those who worshiped him because, as they say, he lives in them and they in him.
SYMBOLIC KINSHIP: Athena / Minerva vs. Mary (Rome).
1.
SPIRITUAL MOTHER.
Athena/Minerva: Mystical protector of Rome and Athens (not biological).
Mary: Spiritual mother imposed upon all believers.
2.
CONNECTION WITH WISDOM.
Athena/Minerva: Goddess of wisdom and pure intellect.
Mary: Called the 'Seat of Wisdom' (Sedes Sapientiae).
3.
PROTECTOR OF NATIONS.
Athena/Minerva: Patroness of the polis (Athens) and of the Roman State.
Mary: Protector of Christian nations and kingdoms.
4.
HEAVENLY RANK.
Athena/Minerva: Deity of the heavens and of the intellectual realm.
Mary: Elevated to the title 'Queen of Heaven.'
5.
FORM OF WORSHIP.
Athena/Minerva: Use of statues, temples, and public rites.
Mary: Use of statues, temples, and public rites.
THE ROMAN SUBSTITUTION.
Rome replaced names, not functions. Where Athena/Minerva or Isis had previously been venerated, 'Marian' temples were later erected with the same maternal and heavenly symbolism. It is the same structure under a new label.
Left: The statue of Athena cries in the series 'Saint Seiya' (Knights of the Zodiac). Right: Rome changed the name of its goddess to Minerva, but it is the same act. https : // youtube . com / shorts / aSJ4nJu8Oww https : // youtube . com / shorts / RhAND4ErnNo
Syncretism: It is the political and religious strategy of cultural recycling. It consists of taking an ancient structure of worship, with its rites and fetishes, and simply overlaying a new narrative so that people continue obeying the same system without noticing the change. There is no faith; there is a rebranding. It is Rome's technique for perpetuating its deities under the disguise of 'holiness,' ensuring that the masses never abandon the worship of matter.
APOCALYPSE 15:3 + ISAIAH 42:13 + DEUTERONOMY 32:41
Jehovah, like a giant warrior, will raise a battle cry: 'I will take vengeance on my enemies.' And what about the love for the enemy that, according to the Bible, the Son of Jehovah preached in order to imitate the supposed perfection of his Father based on love for everyone (Mark 12:25-37, Psalm 110:1-6, Matthew 5:38-48)? Well, that is a lie from the enemies of both, who altered many texts in order to create the Bible.
Matthew 25:41 Then he will also say to those on the left: Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.
HELL: THE ETERNAL FIRE PREPARED FOR THE DRAGON (THE DEVIL) AND HIS ANGELS.
(REVELATION 12:7-12) (FOR HAVING COMBINED TRUTHS WITH HERESIES IN THE BIBLE, THE QURAN, THE TORAH, AND THE APOCRYPHA IN REBELLION AGAINST JUSTICE)
Book of Enoch 95:6 Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who value the price of injustice, for you shall perish suddenly!
Book of Enoch 95:7 Woe to you, unjust people who persecute the righteous, because you yourselves shall be delivered up and persecuted because of that injustice, and the weight of its burden shall fall upon you!
Proverbs 11:8 The righteous shall be delivered from tribulation, and the unjust shall enter in his place.
Proverbs 16:4 Jehovah has made all things for himself, even the wicked for the day of evil.
Book of Enoch 94:10 'I tell you, you unjust people, the One who created you will cast you down. God will have no mercy on your destruction, but will rejoice over your destruction.'
HELL ISAIAH 66:24
MARK 9:44
(Satan and his angels in Hell: The second death: they deserve it!)
They deserve it for lying against Christ and his faithful disciples by accusing them of being the authors of Rome's blasphemies in the Bible, such as loving the Devil (the enemy).
The prophecy of Hell in the book of Isaiah, the Psalms, the Proverbs, and the book of Enoch contains messages that make it clear that God does not love his enemies. Who put false messages into the mouth of Christ except his enemies?
Mark 9:44 where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.
Revelation 20:14 And Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
Revelation 20:15 And whoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. (Whoever was not blessed by my words was sent to Hell.)
Isaiah 66:24 And they shall go forth and look upon the corpses of the men who rebelled against me; for their worm shall not die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be an abhorrence to all humanity.
In the didactic narrative of the image, one of the messengers protected by Jehovah says to one of those satanic angels: 'Daniel 9:21 Gabriel is a man. Deuteronomy 22:5 God hates a man who dresses like a woman. 1 Corinthians 11:7 A man with hair like a woman is a dishonor. Therefore, you are not an angel allied with Gabriel. You are an angel of Satan.'
The Hellenized image of Christ and the saints — inspired by Zeus and Cupid — reflects a biblical message distorted by Hellenistic influence, promoted by false Roman converts. This is the source of the pro-Hellenistic lies in the Bible.
"
"In Mark 3:29, the 'sin against the Holy Spirit' is warned as unforgivable. However, history and the practices of Rome reveal a shocking moral inversion: the truly unforgivable sin, according to their dogma, is questioning the credibility of their Bible. Meanwhile, serious crimes such as the killing of innocents have been ignored or justified under the same authority that claimed to be infallible. This post examines how this 'unique sin' was constructed and how the institution used it to protect its power while justifying historical injustices.
In purposes contrary to Christ is the Antichrist, if you read Isaiah 11 you will see the mission of Christ in his second life, and it is not to favor everyone but only the righteous, but the Antichrist is inclusive, despite being unjust, he wants to climb onto Noah's Ark, despite being unjust he wants to leave Sodom with Lot... Happy are those to whom these words are not offensive. He who is not offended by this message, that one is righteous, congratulations to him: Christianity was created by the Romans, only a mind friendly to celibacy, proper of Greek and Roman leaders, enemies of the ancient Jews, could conceive a message like the one that says: 'These are the ones who did not defile themselves with women, for they remained virgins. They follow the Lamb wherever he goes. They were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and to the Lamb' in Revelation 14:4, or a message like this one which is similar: 'For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like the angels of God in heaven,' in Matthew 22:30, both messages sound as if they came from a Roman Catholic priest, and not from a prophet of God who seeks this blessing for himself: He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the Lord (Proverbs 18:22), Leviticus 21:14 A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, he shall not marry; but he shall take as a wife a virgin from his own people.
I am not Christian; I am henotheist. I believe in one supreme God above all, and I believe that several created gods exist—some faithful, others deceivers. I only pray to the supreme God. But since I was indoctrinated from childhood in Roman Christianity, I believed in its teachings for many years. I applied those ideas even when common sense told me otherwise. For example—so to speak—I turned the other cheek to a woman who had already struck me on one. A woman who, at first, acted like a friend, but then, without justification, began treating me as if I were her enemy, with strange and contradictory behavior. Influenced by the Bible, I believed she had become an enemy because of some spell, and that what she needed was prayer to return to being the friend she had once shown herself to be (or pretended to be). But in the end, everything only got worse. As soon as I had the chance to dig deeper, I uncovered the lie and felt betrayed in my faith. I came to understand that many of those teachings did not come from the true message of justice, but from Roman Hellenism infiltrated into the Scriptures. And I confirmed I had been deceived. That’s why I now denounce Rome and its fraud. I do not fight against God, but against the slanders that have corrupted His message. Proverbs 29:27 declares that the righteous hates the wicked. However, 1 Peter 3:18 claims that the righteous died for the wicked. Who can believe that someone would die for those he hates? To believe it is to have blind faith; it is to accept incoherence. And when blind faith is preached, could it be because the wolf wants his prey not to see the deception?
Jehovah will shout like a mighty warrior: 'I will take vengeance on My enemies!'
(Revelation 15:3 + Isaiah 42:13 + Deuteronomy 32:41 + Nahum 1:2–7)
And what about the so-called 'love for the enemy' that, according to some Bible verses, the Son of Jehovah supposedly preached—claiming we should imitate His Father’s perfection through universal love? (Mark 12:25–37, Psalm 110:1–6, Matthew 5:38–48)
That is a lie spread by the enemies of both Father and Son.
A false doctrine born from mixing Hellenism with sacred words."
"The Ships Arrived Before the Fire | A Science Fiction Story Inspired by Ancient Texts.
'The following is a science fiction story and philosophical reflection set in a distant world... very similar to our own. Any resemblance to past, present, or future realities of Earth is part of the imagination.'
On a world similar to Earth, in a distant galaxy, the human society there was very much like the one on Earth; just as one mandarin resembles another, so that world resembled ours.
And so, they had a book very similar to the Bible that said:
'Revelation 19:19: I saw the beast and the kings of the earth gathered together to confront the righteous who ride white horses...'
Their book also said:
'2 Peter 3:7: But the heavens and the earth which now exist are reserved by the same word, kept for fire on the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.'
The scattered righteous read the book, read messages like that, and reasoned and asked themselves:
'If the unjust are condemned to perish, are they not condemned by their inability to live in peace with one another?'
'If they wage wars, is it just that they force others to fight them?'
'If they launch atomic bombs, is it just that peaceful people must suffer the radiation?'
'That is like being a non-smoker on a bus full of smokers, suffering because of others.'
'How could it be possible that a righteous man would have asked people to love their enemies, if it is the enemies of the righteous who destroy the earth?'
'That seems like an adulterated message.'
'Doesn't it say here that God does not love them?'
'How would His faithful messenger say otherwise?'
Indeed, that book said:
'Revelation 11:18: The nations were angry, and Your wrath has come, and the time to judge the dead, and to reward Your servants the prophets, the saints, and those who fear Your name, both small and great, and to destroy those who destroy the earth.'
Then they understood that, if their world was doomed, God would send ships to rescue them.
And so it happened.
But it was not in their Bible.
That was not written in their Bible.
But they were discerning; they had the intelligence to understand that the same ones who adulterated the original message also concealed something like that.
But they did not conceal everything, because God did not allow it.
God allowed clues so that the discerning would understand that, if there are chosen ones, God's love was never universal:
'Matthew 24:22: And unless those days were shortened, no one would be saved; but for the sake of the elect, those days will be shortened.'
"
"What Did Jonah Breathe Inside the Whale? Great Fish or Great Deception?
Jonah and the Great Fish: Historical Truth or a Great Myth? Do you really believe the whale story?
The story of Nineveh repenting en masse is an absurdity that does not fit with the story of the destruction of Sodom. But the problem is not only biological, it is theological and political. This narrative fits perfectly with the message of Ezekiel 33:11 (which says that the wicked can indeed change), but it directly contradicts Daniel 12:10, which states that the nature of the wicked is immutable and that they will never become righteous.
If the wicked are wicked by nature, then are there wicked people with an expiration date and others without one? I do not believe the story of the 'good thief,' nor that of criminals suddenly becoming saints overnight.
Why do such blatant contradictions exist in the Bible? To me, there is a clear explanation: the Roman Empire manufactured Christianity. By adulterating the texts and mixing its lies with the messages of the peoples it persecuted, it sowed the chaos and incoherence that we see today.
Think about it: if the wicked could become righteous, why did the original law decree Eye for Eye? The answer is political. The Roman Empire found it convenient to erase just retribution and replace it with the false hope of conversion. In this way, they kept peoples subdued, making them believe that the justice of 'eye for eye' was obsolete.
Fantastic fables such as the instant conversion of Nineveh or the transformation of Saul into Paul fit perfectly into the Roman agenda of submission and impunity. In the end, absurd stories such as surviving for three days inside the stomach of a great fish only expose the fiction.
The context of the narrative: The plot of this myth places Jonah fleeing from a divine command to warn Nineveh (the capital of the Assyrian Empire and a historic enemy) of its destruction because of its extreme wickedness. During his escape by ship, a fierce storm breaks out, and to save the crew, Jonah asks to be thrown into the water; at that very moment, the sea magically calms down (Jonah 1:15). Instead of drowning, he is swallowed by a great fish where he spends three days and three nights praying (Jonah 1:17). After being spit out onto dry land, he travels to Nineveh and, in a completely implausible twist, the entire population and its king suddenly 'convert' through fasting (Jonah 3:5-8), causing the punishment to be canceled (Jonah 3:10). A manufactured moral intended to legitimize impunity.
The signature of manipulation: Why logic destroys the myths that certain groups try to 'bless' using AI
Scene: An ancient man speaks as if giving his testimony.
Ancient man:
'I survived drowning in the sea… without drowning inside the whale… nor being dissolved by the acids… for three days.'
[Thousands of years later. A modern man finishes reading the story.]
Modern man:
'I do not believe you at all.'
'A whale's stomach does not contain breathable air, but suffocating digestive gases such as methane and carbon dioxide.'
'A human being would die from asphyxiation within a few minutes.'
'Were you perhaps wearing a special suit with oxygen tanks included at the moment when you were supposedly swallowed by the cetacean?'
'Because in your time… oxygen tanks did not exist.'
The Deception of the 'Technological Oracle'
On May 31, 2026, I found a video on YouTube that is a textbook example of how people's minds are numbed through technological astonishment. The content, sensationalistically titled around how 'Grok AI analyzes all the prayers of the Bible and discovers something surprising,' attempts to use Artificial Intelligence and quantum physics as a magic trick to validate religious dogmas and sell a false narrative of absolute perfection.
The video claims that the AI 'discovered' a universal four-step mathematical algorithm in every answered prayer and that the number seven is stamped throughout the text in a way that 'defies chance.'
What is the real objective? To make the viewer assume that, because a supposedly neutral machine says it, the book must be infallible. But incoherence is exposed, not blessed. Respecting God means respecting truth, and when we pass this narrative through the filter of formal logic and history, the 'divine design' is revealed for what it really is: human editorial engineering.
That same day, I left this comment under the video:
CRITICAL ANALYSIS: AI did not discover a divine design; it discovered the hidden signature of imperial editors.
What a fascinating video in its effort to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a tool to validate dogmas. However, when true critical thinking and logic are applied, this entire narrative of 'mathematical perfection' is completely stripped bare and exposes its own inconsistencies. A message that comes from God must be true, coherent, and never contradict itself; incoherence is exposed, not blessed by calling it a 'mystery.' Let us dismantle this deception point by point:
1_ The Myth of the '4-Stage Algorithm' (Confirmation Bias): The video astonishingly claims that the AI discovered a 'universal secret protocol' (Anchoring, Alignment, Surrender, and Persistence). This does not prove that the book comes from God; it is merely an analysis of editorial engineering. Artificial Intelligences do not discover mystical truths; they process data according to the instructions of whoever writes the prompt. If you program a machine to search for a specific pattern within a text that was previously edited, trimmed, and unified by a political power, the AI will construct the exact argument you asked for. What the video celebrates is actually the detection of the writing template and structural imitation deliberately used by textual engineers so that scattered writings would forcibly fit together into one coordinated product.
2_ The Clash of Imperial Signatures (The 7 and the 19): Toward the end, the video attempts to use the numerology of the number 7 as proof that the text comes from God. However, the destructive logic of the empires themselves tears down that fantasy: if the Roman Empire persecuted with blood and fire the true religion of Jesus (which defended not worshiping images and maintaining the laws of justice), and later took absolute control of all the writings, then it was expected that it would leave its hidden signature within the structure. The pattern of 7 in the Bible and the pattern of 19 in the Quran do not prove that the books came from God; they are the watermarks of the same Roman machinery of control. The proof is that these signatures contradict each other at the very core of the message: the 7 of the Bible seeks to validate that God has a son, while the 19 of the Quran seeks to validate that God has no sons. If the message were divine, whom would you believe? God does not contradict Himself. This mathematical friction demonstrates that both codes are the fingerprint of the same political designer who fabricated false religions in order to divert the original message.
3_ The Biological Absurdity and the Science that Refutes the Manipulation: If the defenders of these texts intend to use science to validate miracles, they are obligated to demonstrate that those stories are coherent with the reality of creation. But the human manipulation is immediately exposed. Take the example of Jonah: from the standpoint of biology and medical physics, it is absolutely impossible for a human being to survive three days inside the stomach of a cetacean. He would die of asphyxiation within minutes due to gastric gases such as methane, and his body would have been disintegrated by hydrochloric acid and digestive enzymes. Modifying narratives to include biologically unsustainable myths demonstrates that the text was altered by human hands seeking to impress the masses through astonishment rather than truth.
4_ The Paradox of Lazarus and the Textual Inconsistencies: The imperial dogma self-destructs when the texts are compared. Hebrews 9:27 categorically states a law: 'it is appointed unto men once to die.' However, John 11 claims that Lazarus was resurrected. Faced with this contradiction, logic leaves us with only three options: either Lazarus is still alive after more than 2,000 years (an absurdity), or Lazarus died twice (which would make Hebrews false), or the story was a theological invention later added by imperial editors in an attempt to force a 'coherence' with the resurrections they themselves had planted in earlier narratives (such as those of Elijah and Elisha). The same absurdity applies to Matthew 27:52 and its 'dead walking through Jerusalem,' an event about which the historical records of the time remain completely silent. An incoherent message cannot come from God.
5_ The Nonsense of 'Quantum Mysticism': Ending the video by pretending that faith works like the 'observer effect' in quantum mechanics, where human belief 'collapses the wave function' in order to create a physical miracle, is an insult to particle physics. Quantum mechanics operates strictly at the subatomic scale; it has absolutely nothing to do with human psychology or theology. Mixing physics with miracles is the desperate tactic of modern charlatanism to dress manipulated dogma in high-tech clothing.
Conclusión: What this video celebrates as a 'mathematical proof discovered by AI' is actually the success of Roman control engineering 1600 years later. AI did not find a message coming from God; it found the fingerprint of the empire that forced humanity to bow before stones, cubes, and statues, contradicting the original commandment not to worship objects made by human hands. Do not be deceived by elegant words: this is not science, it is a political construction of spiritual control conveniently monetized with a cryptocurrency advertisement in the middle of the video.
Closing of the comment:
Do not be deceived by technological jargon or textbook quantum mysticism: AI is only reading the code that imperial editors deliberately planted to control thought. Rome did not only alter the recent texts (the New Testament); in order to impose its new political religion, it needed to adulterate original Judaism (the religion of Jesus that it actually persecuted) and carry out a retrospective reengineering of the ancient texts so that the entire collection would appear to be a unified and perfect design.
But the manipulation left loose ends and evident frictions if we look at the explicit message. In Revelation 15:3, the text states that the saints sing at the same time 'the song of Moses and the song of the Lamb.' Who can logically explain how the vengeful song of Moses in Deuteronomy 32 (where God sharpens His glittering sword, makes His arrows drunk with blood, and executes relentless eye-for-an-eye retribution) can be sung together with a supposed song that preaches submission, meekness, and offering the other cheek to the enemy without taking vengeance against him? It is an aberrant theological and literary contradiction.
Could this instead be a clue that survived in the text to tell us that the true message of Jesus fit perfectly with that of Moses, and therefore never denied the strict justice of eye for eye against the wicked? Everything points to Rome inserting its editorial hand to change the original 'Song of the Lion' into the 'Song of the Lamb,' domesticating the religion of Jesus in order to manufacture submissive subjects before the oppressor. Respecting the truth means exposing the incoherence of this imperial design.
See more about that video and the original comment here in this Portuguese publication: https://gabriels.work/2026/05/31/1-registro-das-batalhas-no-ciberespaco-apocalipse-127-e-houve-guerra-no-ceu-miguel-e-os-seus-anjos-lutaram-contra-o-dragao-e-lutaram-o-dragao-e-os-seus-anjos/
"
"The religion I defend is named justice. █
I will find her when she finds me, and she will believe what I say.
The Roman Empire has betrayed humanity by inventing religions to subjugate it. All institutionalized religions are false. All the sacred books of those religions contain frauds. However, there are messages that make sense. And there are others, missing, that can be deduced from the legitimate messages of justice. Daniel 12:1-13 — 'The prince who fights for justice will rise to receive God's blessing.' Proverbs 18:22 — 'A wife is the blessing God gives to a man.' Leviticus 21:14 — 'He must marry a virgin of his own faith, for she is from his own people, who will be set free when the righteous rise.'
📚 What is an institutionalized religion? An institutionalized religion is when a spiritual belief is transformed into a formal power structure, designed to control people. It ceases to be an individual search for truth or justice and becomes a system dominated by human hierarchies, serving political, economic, or social power. What is just, true, or real no longer matters. The only thing that matters is obedience. An institutionalized religion includes: Churches, synagogues, mosques, temples. Powerful religious leaders (priests, pastors, rabbis, imams, popes, etc.). Manipulated and fraudulent 'official' sacred texts. Dogmas that cannot be questioned. Rules imposed on people's personal lives. Mandatory rites and rituals in order to 'belong.' This is how the Roman Empire, and later other empires, used faith to subjugate people. They turned the sacred into a business. And truth into heresy. If you still believe that obeying a religion is the same as having faith, you were lied to. If you still trust their books, you trust the same people who crucified justice. It's not God speaking in his temples. It's Rome. And Rome never stopped speaking. Wake up. He who seeks justice needs no permission. Nor an institution.
She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.
( – – )
This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:
Revelation 19:11
Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.
Revelation 19:19
Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.
Psalm 2:2-4
'The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:
'Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.'
He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.'
Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be 'the wife of the Lord's anointed,' but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord's anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:
Isaiah 2:8-11
8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.
9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.
10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.
11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.
Proverbs 19:14
House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.
Leviticus 21:14
The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.
Revelation 1:6
And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.
1 Corinthians 11:7
The woman is the glory of man.
What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?
The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of 'Authorized Books of Authorized Religions', but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.
Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.
Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.
This is my story:
José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. However, Monica's jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.
Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.
On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: 'Who are you?' Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: 'Jose, who am I?' Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: 'You are Sandra,' to which she replied: 'You already know who I am.' Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.
Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn't do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, 'Wait, wait, can we meet?' That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.
Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.
Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra's family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.
This had the strange appearance of orchestrated torture. Even when José asked his aunt to unplug the phone at night so he could sleep, she refused, arguing that one of her sons, who lived in Italy, could call at any moment (considering the six-hour time difference between the two countries). What made things even stranger was Monica's fixation on Sandra, even though they hadn't even met. Monica didn't attend the high school where José and Sandra were enrolled, but she began to feel jealous of Sandra after finding a folder with one of José's group projects. The folder listed the names of two women, including Sandra, but for some strange reason, Monica became fixated only on Sandra's name.
Although José initially ignored Sandra's phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn't bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.
That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.
Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra's strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.
So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.
So José turned to Johan and said, 'I study here on Saturdays. Since we're passing by, let's get off for a bit, I'll pay for my course, and then we'll head to the nightclub.'
The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, 'Johan, I can't believe it—Sandra is right there. She's the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I'm going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica's threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what's going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.'
Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—'Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what's going on with you?'—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.
The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, 'So you're the sexual harasser who's been bothering my cousin?'
José, caught off guard, responded, 'What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she's the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you'd see it's about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!'
Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra's cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.
Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up. But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.
The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, 'If he's harassing you, then file a complaint.'
Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.
José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:
'How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.'
This made José suspect that Sandra wasn't just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.
These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra's trap.
Jose's testimony.
I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: https://gabriels.work
I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old.
At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog: and in this video:
). I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.
When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:
' Pray for whoever insults you,'
And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn't know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That's why the advice to pray for her didn't seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.
Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn't think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.
I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:
I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.
The evil of José's family overshadows Sandra's evil:
José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra's harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.
It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church's dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.
Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle's restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.
From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.
From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.
For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a 'dangerous schizophrenic' to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.
His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.
Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:
'This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.'
I have been a computer programmer, I like logic, in Turbo Pascal I created a program capable of producing basic algebra formulas at random, similar to the formula below. In the following document in .PDF you can download the code of the program, this is proof that I'm not stupid, that's why the conclusions of my research should be taken seriously. https://ntiend.me/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/math21.pdf
If K*16=039 then K=2.437
"Cupid is condemned to hell along with the other pagan gods (The fallen angels for their rebellion against justice, sent to eternal punishment). █
Quoting these passages does not mean defending the entire Bible. If 1 John 5:19 says that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one,” but rulers swear on the Bible, then the Devil rules with them. If the Devil rules with them, then fraud also rules with them. Therefore, the Bible contains part of that fraud, camouflaged among truths. By connecting those truths, we can expose their deceptions. Righteous people need to know these truths so that, if they have been deceived by lies added to the Bible or other similar books, they can free themselves from them.
Daniel 12:7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, who was above the waters of the river, when he raised his right hand and his left hand to heaven and swore by Him who lives forever that it shall be for a time, times, and half a time. And when the power of the holy people is completely shattered, all these things shall be finished.
Considering that ‘Devil’ means ‘Slanderer,’ it is natural to expect that the Roman persecutors, being the adversaries of the saints, later bore false witness against the saints and their messages. Thus, they themselves are the Devil, and not an intangible entity that enters and exits people, as they made us believe precisely with passages like Luke 22:3 (“Then Satan entered Judas…”), Mark 5:12-13 (the demons entering the pigs), and John 13:27 (“After the morsel, Satan entered him”).
This is my purpose: to help righteous people not waste their power believing in the lies of impostors who have adulterated the original message, which never asked anyone to kneel before anything or pray to anything that had ever been visible.
It is no coincidence that in this image, promoted by the Roman Church, Cupid appears alongside other pagan gods. They have given the names of the true saints to these false gods, but look at how these men dress and how they wear their long hair. All this goes against faithfulness to God’s laws because it is a sign of rebellion, a sign of the fallen angels (Deuteronomy 22:5).
The serpent, the devil, or Satan (the slanderer) in hell (Isaiah 66:24, Mark 9:44). Matthew 25:41: “Then he will also say to those on his left: ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels’.” Hell: the eternal fire prepared for the serpent and his angels (Revelation 12:7-12), for having combined truths with heresies in the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, and for having created false forbidden gospels that they called apocryphal, to give credibility to lies in the false sacred books, all in rebellion against justice.
Book of Enoch 95:6: “Woe to you, false witnesses and to those who weigh the price of injustice, for you will perish suddenly!” Book of Enoch 95:7: “Woe to you, unjust ones who persecute the righteous, for you yourselves will be handed over and persecuted because of that injustice, and the burden of your guilt will fall upon you!” Proverbs 11:8: “The righteous is delivered from trouble, and the wicked comes in his place.” Proverbs 16:4: “The Lord has made all things for Himself, even the wicked for the day of doom.”
Book of Enoch 94:10: “Unjust ones, I say to you that He who created you will overthrow you; upon your ruin, God will have no mercy, but rather, God will rejoice in your destruction.” Satan and his angels in hell: the second death. They deserve it for lying against Christ and His faithful disciples, accusing them of being the authors of Rome’s blasphemies in the Bible, such as love for the devil (the enemy).
Isaiah 66:24: “And they shall go out and look upon the corpses of the men who have rebelled against me; for their worm shall never die, nor shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be abhorrent to all flesh.” Mark 9:44: “Where their worm does not die, and the fire is never quenched.” Revelation 20:14: “Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death: the lake of fire.”
When the statue is broken, it can’t feel, hear, see, or act—only the false prophet’s pocket feels the pain.
Translating the Bible into all languages—will it bring the kingdom of God closer or perpetuate the deception? Rome invented verses to subjugate the peoples it conquered and erase their right to demand justice. Mt 5:39-41: the other cheek in service of the plunderer.
Excuses of wolves, dismantled by reason: “He is being attacked by Satan,” but Satan lives in the wolves: they are not his victims, they are part of him.
Word of Satan: 'If you cry out for what was stolen, you will be accused of being cruel to the thief; if you bless the thief, you will be canonized for loving the one who is hungry and thirsty... for stealing.'
The false prophet defends the 'prosperity gospel': 'Look at my riches, I have prospered; you wait your turn by fattening my accounts with your sowing. God loves a cheerful giver; rejoice in your pastor's prosperity while you wait for yours.'
Idol worship and saint veneration are the antechamber to blind obedience that leads to the battlefield.
Throughout history, wars between ruling elites have been fought by common citizens who had no personal conflict with the enemy. No government has the moral right to force a human being to kill another.
The false prophet defends the 'prosperity gospel': 'I have prospered, I have much money. Stop suffering, so let go of envy, keep depositing into my accounts, rejoice in my prosperity while I reap what you sow in faith.'
Offer meat, and you will know who is a lamb and who only pretends to be. The lamb rejects temptation; the wolf devours it without hesitation.
The meat reveals what the disguise hides. The wolf disguises itself as a lamb, but cannot hide its hunger for meat.
الوحش الرابع ومملكة العقيدة... لا يوجد الاستيقاظ إلا عندما يكسر طقسًا. إذا استمر الطقس، فلم يحدث أي استيقاظ. https://bestiadn.com/2026/08/10/idi23-quit-the-dogma/
Was atmete Jona im Inneren des Wals? Großer Fisch oder großer Betrug? https://144k.xyz/2026/06/08/was-atmete-jona-im-inneren-des-wals-groser-fisch-oder-groser-betrug/
Those who deceive you cannot give a coherent explanation about this. While some worship without seeing, others trade on their blind faith and multiply it. Confessions of Satan: «I handed them the volumes, set the canons for them, and allowed them the illusion of scholastic protest. As long as the battle is over the interpretation of a comma in the text that I myself managed, the structure remains intact; the real danger to my empire arises when the slave stops looking at the page and looks at the hand that collects the tribute.»"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.