Why do the teachings of Cleobulus appear as gospels in the Bible? What kind of scam is this?

 The Greek sage versus the coherent man: when 'wisdom' is exposed as foolishness

Isaiah 29:13

“Therefore the Lord said: Because this people draw near to me with their mouth, and honor me with their lips, but their heart is far from me, and their fear of me is nothing more than a commandment of men that has been taught to them;

Isaiah 29:14

therefore, behold, I will again cause the astonishment of this people with a great and dreadful wonder; for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall vanish.”

The Greek sage versus the coherent man: when “wisdom” is exposed as foolishness

"The Greek sage spoke… and attentive ears listened: “Do good to your friends and to your enemies… thus you will keep some and attract others.” “Any man, at any moment in life, can be your friend or your enemy, depending on how you conduct yourself with him.”

Were we not told that Jesus said very similar things?

It turns out that these phrases were spoken by Cleobulus of Lindos, one of the so-called Seven Sages of Greece, in the 6th century before Christ… more than 500 years before Jesus.

Curious… isn’t it?

Not only are very similar words later attributed to Jesus —Matthew 5:44—, but it is also claimed that these teachings summarize “the law and the prophets” —Matthew 7:12—… yet the law says in Deuteronomy 19:18-19: “you shall do to the false witness as he intended to do.” And the prophet Nahum says in Nahum 1:2: “God is a jealous and avenging God… and reserves wrath for his enemies.” Nothing about rewarding enemies.

So then…

could it be that an aggressive Rome, confronted with the Jews and their king, never wanted “an eye for an eye”… because it killed the king of the Jews?

Isn’t it obvious that Rome never wanted to be reached by the justice of that law?

The Greek also said: “Moderation is best.”

And it is written:
Ecclesiastes 7:16: “Do not be overly righteous… nor excessively wise.”
Ecclesiastes 7:17: “Do not be overly wicked…”

But it is also written:
Proverbs 9:9: “Give to a wise man, and he will be wiser…”
Revelation 22:11: “He who is righteous, let him practice righteousness still…”

So then…

moderation… or justice without limit?

If Jesus had faced the Greek…
surely his words would sound like this:

And how can you speak of justice… if you want to abolish “an eye for an eye”… the very thing that troubles the murderer? Was God unjust when He established “an eye for an eye”?

If the enemies of the righteous are the unjust… who would ask them to love them… if not another unjust man? If you have nothing just to say… then step down from the platform."

"And that is the same thing Michael would say to the impostor: to the god Mars, whom the Romans called “Michael,” but who demands that one not resist the evil he causes and that the image of that Roman legionary be worshiped.

Were it not the Roman legionaries who arrested Jesus to crucify him?

Today, the false Michael asks people to pray to him, prostrate before his image, not with their own mouth, but with that of his prophets."

The message of Michael would be: "cheek for cheek," for Michael, as a friend of justice, would never rebel against Yahweh and His law:

"Mars, if you preached that one must offer the other cheek to the enemy, then lead by example and offer me now your other cheek."

There is a people, and that people is not all humanity, that does know justice.

Isaiah 51:7 Hear me, you who know righteousness, people in whose heart is my law. Do not fear the reproach of men, nor be dismayed at their insults. 8 For the moth will eat them up like a garment, and the worm will eat them like wool; but my righteousness shall be forever, and my salvation from generation to generation.

Precisely in favor of that people Michael rises, not for all humanity, because God loves only His friends, and not His enemies; therefore He sends Michael only on behalf of the righteous:

Daniel 12:1 At that time Michael shall stand up, the great prince who stands for the children of your people; and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation, even to that time; but at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone who is found written in the book."

The song of Moses and the message of Jesus were compatible, but Rome changed the message of Jesus into one of non-resistance to evil, embodied in the Roman persecutors.

 The song of Moses and the message of Jesus were compatible, but Rome changed the message of Jesus into one of non-resistance to evil, embodied in the Roman persecutors.

Revelation 14:1–3 says that the 144,000 sing a song that no one can learn except them.

Daniel 12:10 explains why: only the wise will understand the mysteries of the end time.

But there is a key detail.

That song is also called the song of Moses and the song of the Lamb (Revelation 15:3).

And the song of Moses presents Jehovah as an avenger and defender of justice (Deuteronomy 32:35–43).

So the question arises:

If the song is the same… how does it fit with “turn the other cheek”? (Matthew 5:39).

What if the message was altered?

What if the persecuted left clues in Revelation so that the wise would recognize that the true message is in harmony with the song of Moses and with the justice of “eye for eye” (Exodus 21:14)?

Then, which is the word of God… and which is that of Babylon?

Revelation 18:20 says:
“Rejoice over her, O heaven… for God has executed judgment.”

But Proverbs 24:17–18 says:
“Do not rejoice when your enemy falls.”

So, which voice is true?

Revelation 6:16 speaks of the wrath of the Lamb.
But Revelation 5:5 says that the Lion has overcome and opens the seals.

Is it the wrath of the Lamb… or that of the Lion?

What if some words were added?

What if the true song can only be recognized by those who can hear, understand… and sing it? (Daniel 12:3).

---

Tags:
song of Moses, Revelation 144000, message of Jesus altered, doctrine of Rome, Daniel 12 wise

If Jesus resurrected Lazarus, where is he now?

Is Lazarus walking among us… and is he more than 2,000 years old?

If Jesus resurrected Lazarus, the question is simple:
did he die again… or would he be nearly 2,000 years old today?

Hebrews 9:27 clearly says:
'Men die only once.'

But in John 11:43–44 it is stated:
'Lazarus, come out! And the man who had died came out.'

So only three options remain:

Option 1: Lazarus did not die again. If so, he would be nearly 2,000 years old. Has anyone seen him?

Option 2: Lazarus did die again. Then man does not die 'only once.'

Option 3: The story was added centuries later and we were told something that never happened. In short: someone invented it… and millions never questioned it.

Three options.
Think carefully:
which of them is the most logical?

A Roman emperor might have thought:
'I will say that everyone must worship him (Hebrews 1:6), I will associate him with Zeus, I will attribute miracles to him, and in the end everyone will worship Jupiter, our Roman god.'

The Bible also speaks of other resurrections:

“Little girl, arise!” (Mark 5:41) — and Jairus’ daughter came back to life.

“Young man, I say to you, arise.” (Luke 7:14) — and the son of the widow of Nain stood up.

Matthew 27:52–53 states that after the death of Jesus:
“The tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised…”

The Old Testament also recounts resurrections:
the son of the widow of Zarephath (1 Kings 17:17–24), the son of the Shunammite woman (2 Kings 4:32–37), and a dead man who revived upon touching the bones of Elisha (2 Kings 13:20–21).

The only logical option is:
Option 3: The stories were added later and never happened.

Because this situation is absurd:

The press interviews the resurrected Lazarus, and he tells them:
“Hebrews 9:27 says that man dies only once, that is why I am still here.”

If there was manipulation of the message,
Rome could not limit itself to altering recent texts,
because the religion it persecuted already had writings
centuries before the Roman Empire existed.

Therefore, in order to impose a new message,
it was also necessary to adapt the ancient texts
so that the whole would appear coherent.

I seek to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, I fell into Sandra’s trap.

This is my story:

José, a young man raised in Catholic teachings, experienced a series of events marked by complex relationships and manipulations. At 19, he began a relationship with Monica, a possessive and jealous woman. Although Jose felt that he should end the relationship, his religious upbringing led him to try to change her with love. 

However, Monica’s jealousy intensified, especially towards Sandra, a classmate who was making advances on Jose.

 Sandra began harassing him in 1995 with anonymous phone calls, in which she made noises with the keyboard and hung up.

On one of those occasions, she revealed that she was the one calling, after Jose angrily asked in the last call: «Who are you?» Sandra called him immediately, but in that call she said: «Jose, who am I?» Jose, recognizing her voice, said to her: «You are Sandra,» to which she replied: «You already know who I am.» Jose avoided confronting her. During that time, Monica, obsessed with Sandra, threatened Jose with harming Sandra, which led Jose to protect Sandra and prolong his relationship with Monica, despite his desire to end it.

Finally, in 1996, Jose broke up with Monica and decided to approach Sandra, who had initially shown interest in him. When Jose tried to talk to her about his feelings, Sandra did not allow him to explain himself, she treated him with offensive words and he did not understand the reason. Jose chose to distance himself, but in 1997 he believed he had the opportunity to talk to Sandra, hoping that she would explain her change of attitude and be able to share the feelings that she had kept silent. On her birthday in July, he called her as he had promised a year earlier when they were still friends—something he couldn’t do in 1996 because he was with Monica. At the time, he used to believe that promises should never be broken (Matthew 5:34-37), though now he understands that some promises and oaths can be reconsidered if made in error or if the person no longer deserves them. As he finished greeting her and was about to hang up, Sandra desperately pleaded, «Wait, wait, can we meet?» That made him think she had reconsidered and would finally explain her change in attitude, allowing him to share the feelings he had kept silent. However, Sandra never gave him clear answers, maintaining the intrigue with evasive and counterproductive attitudes.

Faced with this attitude, Jose decided not to look for her anymore. It was then that constant telephone harassment began. The calls followed the same pattern as in 1995 and this time were directed to the house of his paternal grandmother, where Jose lived. He was convinced that it was Sandra, since Jose had recently given Sandra his number. These calls were constant, morning, afternoon, night, and early morning, and lasted for months. When a family member answered, they did not hang up, but when José answered, the clicking of the keys could be heard before hanging up.

Jose asked his aunt, the owner of the telephone line, to request a record of incoming calls from the telephone company. He planned to use that information as evidence to contact Sandra’s family and express his concern about what she was trying to achieve with this behavior. However, his aunt downplayed his argument and refused to help. Strangely, no one in the house, neither his aunt nor his paternal grandmother, seemed to be outraged by the fact that the calls also occurred in the early morning, and they did not bother to look into how to stop them or identify the person responsible.

Although José initially ignored Sandra’s phone calls, over time he relented and contacted Sandra again, influenced by biblical teachings that advised praying for those who persecuted him. However, Sandra manipulated him emotionally, alternating between insults and requests for him to keep looking for her. After months of this cycle, Jose discovered that it was all a trap. Sandra falsely accused him of sexual harassment, and as if that wasn’t bad enough, Sandra sent some criminals to beat up Jose.

That Tuesday, without José knowing it, Sandra had already set a trap for him.

Days before, José had told his friend Johan about the situation he was going through with Sandra. Johan also suspected that Sandra’s strange behavior might be due to some kind of witchcraft by Mónica. That Tuesday, José visited his old neighborhood where he had lived in 1995 and happened to run into Johan. After hearing more details about the situation, Johan recommended that José forget about Sandra and instead go out to a nightclub to meet women—perhaps he would find someone who could make him forget her. José thought it was a good idea.

So they got on a bus and headed toward the nightclub in downtown Lima. Coincidentally, the route of that bus passed near the IDAT institute. Just one block before reaching IDAT, José suddenly had the idea to get off for a moment to pay for a Saturday course he had enrolled in. He had managed to save some money for it by selling his computer and working for a week in a warehouse. However, he had been forced to quit because they exploited workers with 16-hour shifts while officially recording only 12, and if they refused to complete the week, they were threatened with not being paid at all.

So José turned to Johan and said, «I study here on Saturdays. Since we’re passing by, let’s get off for a bit, I’ll pay for my course, and then we’ll head to the nightclub.»

The moment José stepped off the bus, before even crossing the avenue, he was shocked to see Sandra standing right there on the corner of the institute. In disbelief, he told Johan, «Johan, I can’t believe it—Sandra is right there. She’s the girl I told you about, the one who acts so strangely. Wait for me here; I’m going to ask if she got the letter where I warned her about Mónica’s threats against her, and maybe she can finally explain what’s going on with her and what she wants from me with all her calls.»

Johan stayed back as José approached. But as soon as he started speaking—»Sandra, did you see the letters? Can you finally explain to me what’s going on with you?»—Sandra, without saying a word, gestured with her hand, signaling three thugs who had been hiding in different spots: one in the middle of the avenue, another behind Sandra, and another behind José.

The one standing behind Sandra stepped forward and said, «So you’re the sexual harasser who’s been bothering my cousin?»

José, caught off guard, responded, «What? Me, a harasser? On the contrary, she’s the one harassing me! If you read the letter, you’d see it’s about me trying to understand why she keeps calling me!»

Before he could react, one of the thugs grabbed him by the neck from behind and threw him to the ground. 

Then, together with the one who had claimed to be Sandra’s cousin, they started kicking him. Meanwhile, the third thug went through his pockets, robbing him. It was three against one—José, lying helpless on the pavement.

Luckily, his friend Johan jumped into the fight, managing to give José a chance to get up.

But then the third thug picked up some rocks and started throwing them at both José and Johan.

The attack only stopped when a traffic officer intervened. The officer turned to Sandra and said, «If he’s harassing you, then file a complaint.»

Sandra, visibly nervous, quickly left, knowing full well that her accusation was false.

José, though deeply betrayed, did not go to the police. He had no way to prove the months of harassment he had suffered from Sandra. But beyond the shock of her betrayal, one question haunted him:

«How did she already have this ambush set up when I never come to this place on Tuesday nights? I only come here to study on Saturday mornings.»

This made José suspect that Sandra wasn’t just an ordinary person—she might be a witch with some kind of supernatural power.

These events left a deep mark on Jose, who seeks justice and to expose those who manipulated him. In addition, he seeks to derail the advice in the Bible, such as: pray for those who insult you, because by following that advice, he fell into Sandra’s trap.

Jose’s testimony. █

I am José Carlos Galindo Hinostroza, the author of the blog: BESTIADN . COM,

I was born in Peru, that photo is mine, it is from 1997, I was 22 years old. At that time, I was entangled in the intrigues of Sandra Elizabeth, a former classmate from the IDAT institute. I was confused about what was happening to her (She harassed me in a very complex and extensive way to narrate in this image, but I narrate it at the bottom of this blog:

 I did not rule out the possibility that Mónica Nieves, my ex-girlfriend, had done some witchcraft to her.

When searching for answers in the Bible, I read in Matthew 5:

» Pray for whoever insults you,»

And in those days, Sandra insulted me while telling me she didn’t know what was happening to her, that she wanted to continue being my friend, and that I should keep calling and looking for her again and again, and it went on like this for five months. In short, Sandra pretended to be possessed by something to keep me confused. The lies in the Bible made me believe that good people can behave evilly because of an evil spirit. That’s why the advice to pray for her didn’t seem so crazy to me—because before, Sandra pretended to be a friend, and I fell for her deception.

Thieves often use the strategy of pretending to have good intentions: To steal from stores, they pretend to be customers; to ask for tithes, they pretend to preach the word of God, but they preach that of Rome, etc., etc. Sandra Elizabeth pretended to be a friend, then pretended to be a friend in trouble looking for my help, but all to slander me and ambush me with three criminals, surely out of spite because a year earlier I rejected her advances since I was in love with Monica Nieves, to whom I was faithful. But Monica did not trust my fidelity and threatened to kill Sandra Elizabeth, which is why I broke up with Monica slowly, over eight months, so that Monica wouldn’t think it was because of Sandra. But this is how Sandra Elizabeth paid me back—with slander. She falsely accused me of sexually harassing her, and with that pretext, she ordered three criminals to beat me up—all in front of her.

I narrate all this in my blog and in my YouTube videos:

I do not wish for other righteous men to have bad experiences like I had, which is why I have created what you are reading. I know this will irritate unrighteous people like Sandra, but the truth is like the true gospel—it only favors the righteous.

The evil of José’s family overshadows Sandra’s evil:

José suffered a devastating betrayal by his own family, who not only refused to help him stop Sandra’s harassment but also falsely accused him of having a mental illness. His own relatives used these accusations as a pretext to kidnap and torture him, sending him twice to mental health institutions and a third time to a hospital.

It all began when José read Exodus 20:5 and stopped being Catholic. From that moment on, he became outraged by the Church’s dogmas and started protesting against its doctrines on his own. He also advised his relatives to stop praying to images and told them that he was praying for a friend (Sandra) who was apparently bewitched or possessed. José was under stress due to the harassment, but his relatives did not tolerate him exercising his freedom of religious expression. As a result, they destroyed his professional life, his health, and his reputation by locking him up in mental institutions where he was given sedatives.

Not only was he forcibly institutionalized, but after his release, he was forced to continue taking psychiatric medication under the threat of being locked up again. He fought to break free from those chains, and during the last two years of that injustice, with his programming career ruined, he was forced to work without pay at his uncle’s restaurant. That same uncle betrayed his trust by secretly drugging his meals with psychiatric pills. José only discovered the truth in 2007 thanks to a kitchen assistant named Lidia, who warned him about what was happening.

From 1998 to 2007, José lost nearly ten years of his youth due to his treacherous relatives. In hindsight, he realized that his mistake was defending the Bible to reject Catholicism, as his family never allowed him to read it. They committed this injustice knowing he had no financial resources to defend himself. When he finally broke free from the forced medication, he thought he had earned their respect. His maternal uncles and cousins even offered him a job, but years later, they betrayed him again with such hostility that he was forced to resign. This made him realize that he should never have forgiven them, as their bad intentions were clear.

From that moment on, he decided to study the Bible again, and in 2017, he began noticing its contradictions. Little by little, he understood why God had allowed his relatives to prevent him from defending the Bible in his youth. He discovered biblical inconsistencies and started exposing them in his blogs, where he also recounted the story of his faith and the suffering he endured at the hands of Sandra and, most of all, his own family.

For this reason, in December 2018, his mother attempted to kidnap him again with the help of corrupt police officers and a psychiatrist who issued a false certificate. They accused him of being a «dangerous schizophrenic» to have him institutionalized again, but the attempt failed because he was not home. There were witnesses to the incident, and José had audio recordings, which he presented as evidence to the Peruvian authorities in his complaint, but it was dismissed.

His family knew perfectly well that he was not insane—he had a stable job, a child, and the mother of his child to take care of. However, despite knowing the truth, they attempted to kidnap him again using the same old false accusation. His own mother and other fanatical Catholic relatives led the attempt. Although his complaint was ignored by the Ministry, José exposes these truths in his blogs, making it clear that the evil of his family eclipses even that of Sandra.

Here is the evidence of the kidnappings using the slander of traitors:

«This man is a schizophrenic who urgently needs psychiatric treatment and pills for life.»

https://purifying-the-message.blogspot.com/2026/03/neither-betrayal-of-judas-nor-long.html

The religion I defend is named justice.

She will find me, the virgin woman will believe me.

This is the wheat in the Bible that destroys the Roman tares in the Bible:

Revelation 19:11

Then I saw heaven opened, and there was a white horse; and the one sitting on it was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness, he judges and makes war.

Revelation 19:19

Then I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered together to make war against the one sitting on the horse and against his army.

Psalm 2:2-4

«The kings of the earth set themselves up, and the rulers took counsel together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying:

‘Let us break their bonds apart and cast away their cords from us.’

He who sits in the heavens laughs; the Lord mocks them.»

Now, some basic logic: if the horseman fights for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice. Therefore, they represent the deception of the false religions that rule with them.

The whore of Babylon, which is the false church made by Rome, has considered herself to be «the wife of the Lord’s anointed,» but the false prophets of this idol-selling and flattering word-peddling organization do not share the personal goals of the Lord’s anointed and the true saints, because the ungodly leaders have chosen for themselves the path of idolatry, celibacy, or sacramentalizing unholy marriages in exchange for money. Their religious headquarters are full of idols, including false holy books, before which they bow down:

Isaiah 2:8-11

8 Their land is full of idols; they bow down to the work of their hands, to what their fingers have made.

9 So the man is humbled, and the man is brought low; do not forgive them.

10 Go into the rock, hide yourself in the dust from the terror of the LORD and from the splendor of his majesty.

11 The arrogance of human eyes will be brought low, and the pride of men will be humbled; the LORD alone will be exalted on that day.

Proverbs 19:14

House and wealth are an inheritance from fathers, but a prudent wife is from the LORD.

Leviticus 21:14

The priest of the LORD shall not marry a widow, nor a divorced woman, nor an unclean woman, nor a harlot; he shall take a virgin from his own people as a wife.

Revelation 1:6

And he has made us kings and priests to his God and Father; to him be glory and dominion forever.

1 Corinthians 11:7

The woman is the glory of man.

What does it mean in Revelation that the beast and the kings of the earth wage war on the rider of the white horse and his army?

The meaning is clear, the world leaders are hand in glove with the false prophets who are disseminators of the false religions that are dominant among the kingdoms of the earth, for obvious reasons, that includes Christianity, Islam, etc. These rulers are against justice and truth, which are the values defended by the rider of the white horse and his army loyal to God. As is evident, the deception is part of the false sacred books that these accomplices defend with the label of “Authorized Books of Authorized Religions”, but the only religion that I defend is justice, I defend the right of the righteous not to be deceived with religious deceptions.

Revelation 19:19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to make war against the rider on the horse and against his army.

Now some basic logic, if the horseman stands for justice, but the beast and the kings of the earth fight against this horseman, then the beast and the kings of the earth are against justice, therefore they stand for the deception of the false religions that rule with them.

Have you ever wondered if the Roman Empire truly accepted the teachings of Jesus, or altered them for its own convenience?

Did you never consider that the Roman Empire never truly accepted the teachings of Jesus, but instead altered the message it had once persecuted so fiercely?

Teaching of Cleobulus of Lindos:
"Do good to your friends and to your enemies."

Teaching of Jesus?
Matthew 5:44
"...do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who insult you and persecute you..."

God’s nature according to the prophet Nahum:

Nahum 1:2
"The Lord is a jealous and avenging God; the Lord is full of vengeance and wrath. He takes vengeance on His adversaries and reserves wrath for His enemies."

Did Jesus really present God as an example to abandon the principle of "an eye for an eye"?

Matthew 5:45
"...so that you may be children of your Father in heaven, who makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous."

According to Genesis 19:23–24

“The sun was rising over Sodom, over the wicked
(Genesis 13:13); shortly after, God made fire
and sulfur rain down upon the wicked...”

Do not ask whether Jesus spoke
of a different God;
ask why Rome did.

AVA Law Group https://avalaw.com › Sexual Abuse ⋮

Jehovah's Witness Sex Abuse Sexual abuse survivors and advocates claim the Watchtower Society have collected nearly 10,000 names of alleged sexual abusers in the Church and refuse to ... https://avalaw.com/sexual-abuse/jehovahs-witness-sex-abuse/

---

The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com › us-news › aug › more-t... ⋮

More than 300 Pennsylvania priests abused ... Aug 14, 2018 — More than 300 "predator priests" were found to have committed sexual abuse in Pennsylvania, harming more than 1,000 children, according to a ... https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/14/more-than-300-pennsylvania-priests-committed-sexual-abuse-over-decades

Image showing news of sexual abuse committed by pedophile religious leaders and how the belief that the doctrine of loving one’s enemy comes from God and not from Hellenism contributes to perpetrators not receiving a just punishment: the death penalty.

INCONSISTENCIES DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BETRAYAL OF JUDAS IS A ROMAN INVENTION.

HOWEVER, TODAY HIS CHURCH CLAIMS THAT IF THERE ARE PEDOPHILE PRIESTS, IT’S BECAUSE EVEN JESUS DIDN’T ESCAPE A TRAITOR JUDAS WITHIN HIS CHURCH.

John 13:18
That the betrayal is for Scripture to be fulfilled:
“He who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me.”

John 6:64
Says that Jesus knew from the beginning who would betray him.

1 Peter 2:22
Says that Jesus never sinned.

HOWEVER, THIS SCRIPTURE OF THE BETRAYAL SPEAKS OF A MAN WHO SINS, A MAN WHO TRUSTED IN THE MAN WHO LATER BETRAYED HIM. BUT NO ONE WHO KNOWS BEFOREHAND WHO IS A TRAITOR COULD TRUST IN HIM.

Psalm 41:4
“I said, O LORD, be gracious to me;
heal my soul, for I have sinned against You.”

Psalm 41:9
“Even my close friend in whom I trusted,
who ate my bread, has lifted his heel against me.”

He does not love his enemies, but God supports him because this sinner is righteous; therefore, love for the enemy was never the true message that Rome wanted to destroy through persecution.

(Psalms 41:10–12, Proverbs 29:27, Daniel 12:10, Psalms 118:17–20).

Tags: the false gospel,injustice exposed,deception exposed,

The friends and the enemies.

If you consider the enemies of innocent children to be your enemies, who would ask us to love them?

Do you believe that teaching truly came from the faithful Son of God just because the Bible attributes that teaching to him?

Have you considered that, in order to contain the texts it does today, these texts had to be filtered through the eyes of Roman emperors? Do you trust that the Roman emperors, notorious for their pedophilic practices, were truthful?

Look at these two images and prepare for the message that follows.

Notice the strange similarity between the face attributed to Jesus and the face of Zeus. But also consider what the myth says about Zeus. How could Jesus physically resemble the one who, according to the myth, sexually abused Ganymede before he reached adulthood?

Note also how in Greece they considered wise someone who preached love for enemies. Considering that the worshippers of Zeus ate pork, and that the religion of Jesus' people forbade eating pork, how could Jesus have actually resembled the Greek god, preached a teaching that a Greek philosopher had already held centuries earlier, and, to top it all off, be told that eating pork no longer defiles a person and that his followers preached the same thing (Matthew 5:11; 1 Timothy 6:1-5)?

I see syncretism here: an adaptation of the original message pursued by Rome to make it fit with Greco-Roman tastes.

Let us remember that around 120 BC, Jews of the same faith in which Jesus grew up were tortured by Zeus worshippers for refusing to eat pork, as they respected a commandment from God that forbade it (2 Maccabees 7; 2 Maccabees 6; Deuteronomy 14:8). Does it make sense that this happened only for God, through his messenger, to later annul that law?

That makes no sense.

It also wouldn't make sense to assume that the Roman persecutors respected the integrity of the messages of the Law and the prophets before Jesus. If you see things that don't add up, I've already given you an explanation of why.

If we consider that the Roman emperors were the ones who had the power to decide which texts would circulate and which would not, does it make sense to assume that they left intact the messages that denounced them or that contradicted their interests?

Notice that they worshipped statues of  Jupiter  (the Roman equivalent of  Zeus ). Isn't it strange that the Bible says in  Hebrews 1  about Jesus—whom they associated with the face of Jupiter—  "let all the gods worship him" ?

Consider that it is said   in  Deuteronomy 4 that God did not appear as a human being or in any other form precisely to avoid idolatry. Furthermore,  Psalm 97  speaks only of God being worshipped.

Then the question arises:  how would God ask that a mortal creature who died on the cross be worshipped?

They no longer worship my image but his', Zeus //11

The Anti-Satanic Force: Reason Destroys Satanism and Its Occultism. //16

The stone of justice that God does not reject destroys Satanism and its occultism.

Satanism can be obvious or hidden under the guise of "faithfulness to God," deceiving hundreds of millions of people who are too lazy to think and investigate with critical thinking.

Daniel 8:25 "And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand."

Isaiah 28:15 "Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with Sheol are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves."

Many speak of these prophecies, but almost no one has bothered to denounce the contradictions that exist in the Bible. My case is different. Throughout the videos on my channel, you will see how I debunk many dogmas based on contradictory texts of the Bible. 

Jesus speaks here of life for life , not of a God who forgives murderers who did know what they were doing .

In this parable there is nothing that harmonizes with the idea of ​​forgiving enemies or with the supposed prayer attributed to Jesus: “Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing” (Luke 23:34).

The story itself shows that the killers acted with full awareness of their plan .

Mark 12:7-11

7 But those tenants said to one another, “ This is the heir. Come, let’s kill him, and the inheritance will be ours.”
8 So they seized him, killed him, and threw him out of the vineyard.
9 What then will the owner of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy those tenants and give the vineyard to others.
10 Have you not even read this Scripture?

The stone that the builders rejected
has become the cornerstone;

11 The Lord has done this,
and it is marvelous in our eyes.

Think about this: if Michael rises against the Devil in the time of the end, it is because the Devil dominates the world until then. Do you think Satan would allow the Bible to be the official book of one of the dominant religions in the world where he reigns with his deceptions, if that book did not have messages infiltrated by Satan?

Thus, many people practice satanism without knowing it, because of those who practice it knowingly and deceive many into practicing it unknowingly. If prophecy speaks of Satan speaking as God's adversary, it is logical to understand that if God said: "eye for eye," Satan says "offer the other cheek"; but since Satan means "the false witness," he gave false testimony of Jesus and falsely accused him of having taught it.

Daniel 7:25 "And he shall speak great words against the most High..."

Do you think Satan would limit himself only to speaking words against Jesus? Obviously, Satan also spoke words against Moses and the prophets; that is why there are unjust messages throughout the Bible in conflict with just messages in the Bible.

Thus we have these examples:

• Genesis 4:15: Murderer protected from the death penalty.

• Numbers 35:33: Murderer condemned to death.

• Ezekiel 33:18-20: The righteous can become unrighteous, and the unrighteous can become righteous.

• Against Daniel 12:10: The righteous cannot become unrighteous, and the unrighteous cannot become righteous.

Now then, if the unrighteous could truly become righteous, the original message of Jesus would not have been persecuted by anyone, but accepted by everyone. And obviously, this is not limited only to the Bible. There are other dominant religions in the world that consider other books as sacred.

If they are dominant religions and Satan was given power over every nation, these religions cannot be free from the deception of the one who dominates the world: Revelation 13:7 "And power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations."

No, we are not talking about political power as many usually say; it is about religious power. If you observe the practices in countries like Peru every time their rulers take office, they swear before a cross and the Bible. In contrast, the leaders of the Vatican do not swear before the constitution of any country when they are elected.

Why do people bow before the image of a skull? If that is not a cult of death, what is it? The mere act of prostrating before an object to render religious worship is already idolatry, and therefore something satanic. If a skull, a serpent, the moon, or the sun are part of the adored figure, there you have it: satanism continues to demand the worship of the sun, the moon, death and, in short, Satan, the serpent.

Furthermore, as part of their ritual, while they sin by worshiping creatures, they confess to being recurring sinners; that is, they affirm that they will continue to sin even at the hour of their death. But God does not want His people to sin until death with the religions of Babylon; that is why the call is: Revelation 18:4 "Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues."

Babylon is not a single religion, do not be confused. Babylon is a club of religions whose line of business centers on idolatry and lies. That is why their leaders meet and embrace; that is why they arrange official religions in certain countries and divide the cake among themselves, while telling people the absurdity of following them: "All religions present here lead to the same God."

But the people who swallow that discourse are so foolish that they do not stop to reason: "If these paths with mutually exclusive teachings lead to the same God, is not their god the contradiction? Does God contradict Himself and have messages adapted to the taste of each believer that can be opposites according to each person?"

When messages are adapted to be accepted, we speak of syncretism; and if we speak of syncretism, we speak of lies and business, of clients and sellers, and never of a just message. If the just message is modified to please the one who pays, it ceases to be a just message. That is why Babylon is called a harlot, for she sells her messages, her flatteries, and lies.

That's why their leaders meet and embrace; that's why they establish official religions in certain countries, dividing the spoils among themselves, while telling people how absurd it is to follow them: "All the religions here lead to the same God." But the people who swallow this rhetoric are so foolish that they don't stop to reason: "If these paths with mutually exclusive teachings lead to the same God, isn't their god a contradiction? Does God contradict himself and have messages tailored to each believer's taste, messages that can be contradictory depending on the individual?" When messages are adapted to be accepted, we speak of syncretism; and if we speak of syncretism, we speak of lies and business, of clients and sellers, and never of a just message. If a just message is modified to please whoever pays, it ceases to be a just message. That's why Babylon is called a harlot, because she sells her messages, her flattery, and her lies.

Death says: "With deceptions I, death, entered the world, and with deceptions I have millions kneeling before my symbol and, thus, before sin; sin that I make them say they will commit “now and at the hour”... when I take them away."

The bronze serpent that Moses made by God's commission was special because the people who looked at it were healed (Numbers 21:7-9), but with God's blessing it was destroyed by King Hezekiah because the people had begun to worship the statue of the serpent and also the statue of a woman (2 Kings 18:1-7).

Today we see the image of the moon, the serpent, and the woman being worshiped in a single idol. And who guides the people to these sinful practices? Babylon, the one who showed from the beginning the disrespect for the laws of God; therefore, she adulterated messages to thus deny the eye for an eye.

The serpent says: "You thought that here you were stepping on me, but here you are my prey: kneeling, you worship me. I, the serpent, deceived you with my cunning, as I deceived my prey from the beginning."

Daniel 12:1 At that time Michael, the great prince who stands guard over your people, will arise. There will be a time of distress such as has not happened from the beginning of nations until that time. But at that time your people— everyone whose name is found written in the book—will be delivered.

Death says: "I sin against God and will continue to sin against God until I die [with] our sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen."

Revelation 20:14 Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death . 15 And anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire.

Psalm 118:17 I will not die, but live, 

And I will recount the works of JAH.

18 The Lord punished me severely,

But he did not deliver me to death.

19 Open to me the gates of justice;

I will enter through them, I will praise JAH.

20 This is the gate of the Lord;

The righteous will enter through it .

21 I will praise you because you have heard me,

And you came to save me.

22 The stone the builders rejected

He has become the head of the angle.

23 This is from Jehovah,

And it is a wonderful thing in our eyes.